By Jessica Corbett/Common Dreams
Internal e-mails reported on Tuesday by the Guardian and MLive reveal that executives at a water company contracted to assess the water system in Flint, Michigan privately expressed concerns that residents “might be at risk of being poisoned by lead in their tap water” months before the city publicly admitted the problem in 2015.
The e-mails, obtained by the watchdog group Corporate Accountability, came to light through a lawsuit filed in the Genesee County Circuit Court by the Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, a Democrat who took office in January.
The state’s suit accused the company, Veolia, of “professional negligence, negligence, public nuisance, unjust enrichment, and fraud.”
Last month a state judge threw out all but the unjust enrichment claim.
Corporate Accountability spokesperson Alissa Weinman told the newspapers that Veolia’s actions related to Flint were “despicable.”
“The documents show a Veolia executive, a month before the corporation told the city its water was safe, saying that ‘lead seems to be a problem,'” Weinman said. “I think anyone has to ask themselves how the story in Flint would be different five years later now if Veolia had made those private concerns public.”
In April 2014, an emergency manager appointed by Michigan’s then-governor, Republican Rick Snyder, switched Flint’s water supply from Detroit’s system to the Flint River in a bid to save money. By August, city officials had issued boil-water alerts because of coliform bacteria. In February 2015, high levels of lead were found in the drinking water at the home of Lee Anne Walters, who notified the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
However, it wasn’t until September that public health experts began publicly raising alarm about Flint’s corrosive water causing lead to leach from the city’s aging pipes, and it wasn’t until October that officials told residents to not drink the water, distributed filters, and expanded testing. Although Flint reconnected to Detroit’s water system in October, Flint’s residents still live with the consequences of the water crisis.
In February 2015, Veolia signed a $40,000 contract with Flint. According to the company, the assessment was only focused on bacteria and chlorine compounds called trihalomethanes. The reporting Tuesday raises questions about what that timeline might have looked like had Veolia, one of the largest utility companies in the world, publicly raised concerns about lead earlier. It also points out that while senior employees were privately raising such concerns, “Veolia was exploring other lucrative contracts with the city.”
Veolia sent a 20-page response to the newspapers, accusing city and state officials of “trying to create a corporate villain where one does not exist.” The company added that “we now know in 2019 the myriad of ways that the government officials behaved badly, but as the Flint water crisis unfolded many of those facts were unknown, concealed, and covered up by the government perpetrators.”
The Guardian and MLive detail some of the e-mails sent internally by Veolia’s senior staff about lead concerns dating back to February 2015:
“Do not pass this on,” wrote Rob Nicholas, then the vice president of development, in an e-mail to Veolia executives. “The City however needs to be aware of this problem with lead and operate the system to minimize this as much as possible and consider the impact in future plans. We had already identified that as something to be reviewed.”
Nicholas forwarded the information to Veolia engineer Marvin Gnagy, adding: “Yep. Lead seems to be a problem.”
Days later, Veolia technology vice president Bill Fahey e-mailed senior executives calling for the company to advise Flint to change its water supply, adding that “the politics of this should not get in the way of making the best recommendation.” Reiterating the call in another e-mail, he added: “PLEASE . . . this will come back and bite us.”
Nayyirah Shariff, who directs of the local group Flint Rising, told the papers she feels Veolia downplayed concerns publicly. From February to March 2015, the company held a news conference and public meetings, plus put out an interim water quality report. As Shariff put it, “They were like, ‘everything is fine.'”
This post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
–
Previously:
* The Best Reporting (So Far) On The Flint Water Crisis.
* Item: Flint Hint.
* How Al-Jazeera America Reported The Flint Water Crisis – A Year Ago.
* A Flint Journal Reporter Explains How The Water Crisis Happened.
* Race Best Predicts Whether You Live Near Pollution.
* How The EPA Has Failed to Challenge Environmental Racism in Flint – and Beyond.
* We Helped Uncover A Public Health Crisis In Flint, But Learned There Are Costs To Doing Good Science.
* Michigan’s Top State Health Official Among Five Charged With Involuntary Manslaughter For Role In Flint Water Crisis.
* Flint Town.
–
Plus:
The Unjust Coverage Of The Flint Water Crisis.
–
Comments welcome.
Posted on December 11, 2019