By Steve Rhodes
The bid is over, but the madness remains.
1. “If the International Olympics Committee had given the 2016 games to Chicago, you can be sure Mayor Daley would accept a full share of the credit,” the Tribune’s Steve Chapman writes. “But when Chicago had lost, he was not eager to take responsibility. He said he wouldn’t do anything differently. And he put the blame somewhere else: on the news media. Journalists in Rio de Janeiro, he claimed, were fully behind their city’s bid, while the Chicago press was not.
“Oh, please. Both the Tribune and the Sun-Times endorsed the bid in their editorial pages. The local TV stations, in the coverage I saw, were positively boosterish. A few churlish pundits like myself disagreed. But I’d be surprised if anyone at the IOC cares what we think.
“True, the Chicago news media did treat the bid as a legitimate story deserving the same scrutiny as any other public endeavor, rather than serving as mindless shills for the cause. But that’s the role of honest news media. I haven’t been following the Brazilian press, but I suspect Daley hasn’t either. I strongly doubt that the support among journalists was as vocal and universal as he believes.
“His real model apparently comes from the Beijing Olympics, which the Chinese government was able to pursue without the inconvenience of a free and independent press. Democracy can be such a drag.”
Except Chapman is wrong about the mindless shills thing. Mindless shilling was at an all-time high.
Read More
Posted on October 5, 2009