By Steve Rhodes
Our very own Natasha Julius wrote this to me during an e-mail exchange this morning about the Obama library. I thought it was worthy of sharing:
What’s that old adage? Follow the what now?
Anyway, my understanding is that the UIC bid included two sites (originally three, but they nixed one – to my surprise – at Illinois Medical Center): one on the main campus to house the archives and a second in North Lawndale that would house a community development center. if I’m not mistaken, the RFP from the foundation heavily stressed community involvement, jobs incubation, having a long-term vision to transform the city, etc.
UIC is a land-grant institution; it serves, on the whole, a much less advantaged population than the private U of C. It has the space to house the archives on campus and there would be a direct transit link between the first site and the second via the Blue Line. The third site, if memory serves, was to house a research center. Not sure whether that was blended into the campus site or the North Lawndale site, but the bid had a comprehensive view of how to execute the foundation’s stated vision on the ground in two neighborhoods that are still lagging relative to Hyde Park and even Woodlawn. It’s pretty simple: If the Obamas want to do what their foundation says, they’ll choose UIC. If they want to assist a private institution in its bid to take over more public land and expand its elitist footprint, they’ll choose U of C.
I’ve been fortunate through friends and through work to get to know a little about both communities in question. No question both places could use more investment, so now it’s a question of what sort of investment. Do you want to plop down a privately-run institution that removes land from public control and maybe offers a few construction and security jobs or do you want to partner with a public institution on a long-range effort to transform a struggling neighborhood?
Sold.
Read More
Posted on January 16, 2015