By Steve Rhodes
Here’s what I wrote in an e-mail exchange on Friday:
“The Buffalo prosecutors can charge the case with or without the accused – though the DA there is known to be exceedingly cautious and is also, I think, running for judge. So his political calculation, because apparently he’s a political animal, is whether he’d alienate more women voters by prosecuting than Pat Kane fanboys.
“HOWEVER, it really isn’t up to him in that it’s going before a grand jury. If the grand jury doesn’t indict, it will only be because the prosecutor has purposely presented the weakest version of the case . . . because, as you know, a grand jury will indict a ham sandwich if the prosecutor tells it too.
“I don’t know what to think of settlement talks. My gut tells me the talks are going on and the Kane lawyer is lying . . . or somehow playing semantics. And my guess is that the prosecutor delayed the grand jury to let settlement talks proceed – even though one doesn’t have to have anything to do with the other. A political dance is going on right now, and I haven’t seen a single reporter really do a good job on this. The Buffalo News reporters are horrible, and the Trib just did that story about settlement talks that I found unsatisfying.
“In the podcast, I think Coach is wrong when he guesses that the Blackhawks must know something we don’t. No. The likelihood of that is near zero. But the Blackhawks are all in now on Kane’s innocence, in my view, given what they’ve said, what they’ve allowed, and what captain Johnny Toews is saying.
“Truly, I don’t think I can watch that team anymore. At first, it would just have been Kane. Now the whole team is dirty to me. Even if Kane is innocent.”
Read More
Posted on September 19, 2015