Chicago - A message from the station manager

Big Box of Nonsense: Wal-Mart’s Imaginary Billions

By Scott Gordon

Don’t worry, House of Smiley. Be happy.
You’re not as bad off as you think.
Yes, the Chicago City Council voted Wednesday on a living wage proposal that will require “big-box” retailers such as yourself to pay workers more than you are used to.
But you’re still in pretty good shape – surely up to absorbing Chicago’s new rules and still make gobs of money. And same to you, Chicago – unless you believe Wal-Mart’s propaganda. Those full-page newspaper ads desperately asking, “Would You Turn Down $6.5 billion?” don’t really add up.

Read More

Posted on July 26, 2006

The Machine Must Die Part I

By Steve Rhodes

What is there left to say about Todd Stroger, aside from wishing he would just go away?
Actually, plenty. After all, we still don’t know who Todd Stroger is. I mean, besides the shameless son of John Stroger.

Read More

Posted on July 19, 2006

The [Patronage] Papers

By Steve Rhodes

The verdict itself in the City Hall hiring fraud trial was nothing but anti-climactic. But the aftermath has been nothing but downright weird. Who is criminal defense lawyer Thomas Anthony Durkin, and what planet does he live on? How could the consistently dim-witted Sun-Times editorial page get it so right and the often-misguided but more solidly consistent Tribune editorial page get it so wrong? And how blind to reality are the patronage apologists who continue to insist in the face of overwhelming evidence that basing jobs and promotions on political considerations somehow results in a superior, well-oiled workforce?
Let’s take a look.

Read More

Posted on July 8, 2006

Blogging For Freedom

By Scott Gordon

When the news broke in May that the National Security Agency had created a huge database of Americans’ phone records, incensed portions of the blogosphere cranked up their message machines, demanding that something be done.
But what?
Daily Kos blogger Da Buddy had an idea. In an “ACTION ITEM” posted on Kos, Da Buddy urged readers to “bombard” the NSA with Freedom of Information Act requests asking for records involving their own phone numbers. “And they HAVE to respond within 20 days, by law!” Da Buddy assured confidently.
Not a bad idea, but a rather unknowing one. Da Buddy’s mob could indeed expect a response within 20 days – most likely a letter from the NSA explaining why the agency would need more than 20 days to respond to their requests.
The Freedom of Information Act is a jewel of democracy, but an imperfect one. The NSA’s own FOIA policy (pdf), for example, states that “In the event the Director of Policy cannot respond within 20 working days due to unusual circumstances, the chief of the FOIA office shall advise the requester of the reason for the delay and negotiate a completion date with the requester.”
So good luck with that.
Freedom geeks are not only celebrating Independence Day this week, but the the 40th anniversary of the Freedom of Information Act. That makes it a particularly good time to consider FOIA’s many loopholes as well as the opportunity presented by the growing swarm of bloggers and citizen journalists to press for fixes both federally and, perhaps more importantly, in state FOIA counterparts. Because one thing we’ve clearly learned in the last 40 years is that the use of the Freedom of Information Act is neither free nor always informative.

Read More

Posted on July 2, 2006