Beachwood Sports ArchiveA monthly look back
Beachwood Sports VideoPlease Stop Believing 99 Years of Cub Losses The 1908 Song Blame It On Bartman We Can't Wait 100 Years Dusty Must Get Fired
Search The Beachwood Reporter
Subscribe to the Newsletter
A former DePaul associate head coach violated NCAA ethical conduct rules when he knowingly directed the former assistant director of basketball operations to provide impermissible recruiting benefits to a recruit, according to a Division I Committee on Infractions panel.
Further, the committee said the men's basketball head coach violated NCAA head coach responsibility rules when he did not stop or prevent violations from occurring in his program.
The men's basketball program recruited the student-athlete, who had graduated from high school but had not yet met NCAA initial eligibility requirements. To help ensure the necessary coursework was completed, the committee said a former associate head coach arranged for the assistant director of basketball operations to live with the prospect. The assistant director of basketball operations did not complete the prospect's coursework, but he monitored the recruit's progress, limited his extracurricular activities and ensured tests were taken.
The student-athlete met eligibility requirements and enrolled at the university. Because the arrangement was an impermissible recruiting benefit, the committee said the student-athlete competed while ineligible. The arrangement also involved impermissible recruiting contact, which caused the men's basketball program to exceed the number of allowable coaches.
The head coach did not promote an atmosphere of compliance because three men's basketball staff members knew about the arrangement but did not report the violation or question whether it was allowable, according to the committee.
Even more troubling to the committee was the director of basketball operations stated he knew the contact was a violation but did not report it because he did not want to be disloyal, cause tension, get in the way of the associate head coach or otherwise hurt his career.
He also did not know how to report violations.
The committee said the assistant director of basketball operations was also concerned for his future and did not question the associate head coach's directions.
According to the committee, a culture of silence pervaded the program.
The head coach did not monitor his staff when he did not actively look for red flags or ask questions about the assistant director of basketball operations' two-week absence. The committee directed that head coaches must verify - not just trust - that staff members are following the rules. The committee recognized the head coach's efforts to require staff attendance at compliance meetings and communicate with compliance officials, but it said he needed to do more.
"The membership requires proactive engagement from head coaches as leaders of programs," the committee said in its decision. "The head coach created an environment where staff members did not report violations or consult with the compliance staff but chose to remain silent. The head coach simply did not ensure a compliant program."
The committee used the Division I membership-approved infractions penalty guidelines to prescribe the following measures:
* Three years of probation.
* Suspension of the head coach from the first three regular-season games of the 2019-20 season.
* A three-year show-cause order for the former associate head coach. During that period, any NCAA member school employing him must restrict him from any athletically related duties unless it shows cause why the restrictions should not apply.
* A vacation of records in which the men's basketball student-athlete competed while ineligible. The university must provide a written report containing the contests impacted to the NCAA media coordination and statistics staff within 45 days of the public decision release.
Recruiting restrictions, including:
* A reduction of six men's basketball recruiting-person days during the 2017-18 academic year (self-imposed by the university).
* A reduction of six men's basketball recruiting-person days in April 2019 (self-imposed by the university).
* A $5,000 fine, plus 1% of the men's basketball program budget.
Members of the Committee on Infractions are drawn from the NCAA membership and the public. The members of the panel who reviewed this case are Norman Bay, attorney in private practice; Jody Conradt, special assistant to athletics and retired head women's basketball coach at Texas; Jason Leonard, executive director of athletics compliance at Oklahoma; Joel Maturi, former Minnesota athletics director; David Roberts, chief hearing officer for this panel, senior administrator at Southern California and vice chair of the Committee on Infractions; Sarah Wake, associate general counsel and associate vice president for equity at Northwestern.
* Listen to the media teleconference:
DePaul University Statement:
"The decision and findings by the NCAA Committee on Infractions (COI) following a self-reported infraction, and subsequent cooperation, by DePaul University are disappointing.
"This infraction was an isolated incident directed and then concealed by a former staff member that resulted in, at most, a limited recruiting advantage relative to one former student-athlete.
"Since our self-report in January 2018, DePaul has cooperated with the NCAA Enforcement staff to proactively pursue the resolution of this matter and has reviewed and further strengthened related protocol and practice.
"DePaul respectfully disagrees with the COI's findings relative to head coach Dave Leitao under the Head Coach Control doctrine. Coach Leitao is a man of character and integrity, who has the support of the administration in leading our men's basketball program.
"In the interest of concluding the infractions process and moving forward for the men's basketball program, DePaul has agreed to accept the penalties as described in the COI's decision.
"DePaul would like to thank the NCAA Committee on Infractions panel for its thoughtful hearing of this matter, and the NCAA Enforcement staff for their professionalism throughout this process. The university will make no further statements about this matter."
* And . . .
It's unfortunate. DePaul will NEVER learn.— Silvy (@WaddleandSilvy) July 23, 2019
Owned this city during my childhood but never evolved. And the saddest part is the school seems to have never wanted to evolve. https://t.co/EtRh5WAUIy
I will say this, all the FBI stuff and bribery and coaches on wire taps (allegedly) paying players - yet, the NCAA goes and gets DePaul and Dave Leitao and their 10 wins a season. It reminds of this Jerry Tarkanian quote from 30 years ago. pic.twitter.com/5mTqYxivx4— Tim Ring (@timringTV) July 23, 2019
* Furthermore . . .
It's important to remember that DePaul Basketball has finished in the ⬇️ of the conference year after year...while cheating.— Jonathan Ballew (@JCB_Journo) July 23, 2019
DePaul should be recruiting top Chicago talent every year. This mismanaged program is frustrating.
(I deleted about 5 angrier versions of this tweet) https://t.co/FW6PxpReEu
Just a friendly reminder that DePaul passed on Bobby Hurley in favor of Dave Leitao in 2015. https://t.co/SlIBHs7tQp— Tim Ring (@timringTV) July 23, 2019
-More from Beachwood Sports »
Seriously, I was betting against the desk, at good prices.Continue reading "TrackNotes: Punditry As A Handicapping Tool" »
Posted on Apr 30, 2021
It is an illusion that newspaper newsrooms in those days were bastions of free-thinking liberals. They weren't.Continue reading "Why We Hated Ali - And Then Loved Him" »
Posted on Apr 28, 2021
Dodged a bullet.Continue reading "Superleague Failure Good For The Women's Game" »
Posted on Apr 27, 2021
Nicky Two Strikes, Yaz and the Yerminator.Continue reading "Catching Fire" »
Posted on Apr 26, 2021