Beachwood Sports ArchiveA monthly look back
Beachwood Sports VideoPlease Stop Believing 99 Years of Cub Losses The 1908 Song Blame It On Bartman We Can't Wait 100 Years Dusty Must Get Fired
Search The Beachwood Reporter
Subscribe to the Newsletter
The doctors who patrol the sidelines of NFL games to assess whether injured players can safely return to the field should report to the league and players' union rather than individual teams, said a Harvard University study released on Thursday.
That was one of the recommendations in a 500-page report by Harvard researchers who have worked with the National Football League Players Association union over the past two years to study the heavy physical toll that the sport takes on athletes.
The study comes amid heavy scrutiny for football, at all levels of play, over the high rates of concussion suffered on the field.
Repeated concussions are linked to the brain disease known as chronic traumatic encephalopathy, which can cause dementia. The condition has been diagnosed in former players including Hall of Fame linebacker Junior Seau and Pro Bowl safety Dave Duerson, who both committed suicide.
While emphasizing that the current structure is not deliberately unethical, it said team doctors, trainers and other medical staff may feel pressured to return injured players to the game more quickly than medically warranted to ensure the team remains competitive.
"NFL football has a storied history, and holds an important place in this country. The men who play it deserve to have their health safeguarded," said Glenn Cohen, a law professor who co-authored the study.
The recommendation would call for two groups of doctors to monitor players, one reporting directly to the teams and one to the league and players' union. The league currently employs about 175 doctors.
The NFL called the recommendations "untenable and impractical."
"There is no higher priority in the NFL than the health and safety of our players, both during and after their playing careers," said league spokesman Brian McCarthy, in an e-mail.
He noted that the NFL has taken a number of steps in recent years to reduce the physical risk to players, which include changing rules to ban the most dangerous helmet-to-helmet hits and changing rules on practice and training.
Indeed, the report cited the decision to place independent doctors on the sidelines charged with evaluating players for signs of concussion as an example of the value of changing the reporting structure for medical personnel.
The Harvard report recommended further strengthening the rules regarding concussions, including shifting diagnosed players onto short-term injured reserve lists, which would allow teams to fill their spots on their 53-man rosters.
Links by Beachwood.
From the report:
Media have been reporting on injuries since the NFL's inception. At the same time, reporters have also been praising players who played through injuries for just as long.
The Chicago Daily Tribune's coverage of the NFL champion 1940 Chicago Bears provides some descriptive examples. In the account of a key victory that season, the Bears' 14-7 win over the Green Bay Packers, writer George Strickler declared "the story of the game is written in the second half, when [the Bears' George] Swisher leaped from the bench incased (sic) in tape that protected his recently fractured ribs and brought the breath out of a record- breaking crowd of 45,434[.]"
The article went on to praise Packers fullback Clark Hinkle, "who played a good share of the contest with a back injury that would have kept him out of any game except one with the Bears."
About a month later, Strickler's preview of the championship matchup between the Bears and the Washington football club devoted a paragraph to Swisher, who had an injured heel but was declared set to play, and to two injured Washington players.
The converse of this praise is that members of the media have also been willing to criticize those players they believe lack toughness, not an uncommon occurrence.
-More from Beachwood Sports »