Chicago - Sep. 19, 2020
Music TV Politics Sports Books People Places & Things
 
Beachwood Politics
Our monthly archive.
Who We Are
Chicago by the numbers.
Sausage Links
Wiki Daley
Wiki Rahm
Illinois Channel
CAN TV
Ralph Martire
Doonesbury
Government Attic
Division Street
Indie Political Report
The Obameter
ProPublica
The Intercept
SCOTUS Blog
American Dream Betrayed

The State Of Stop-And-Frisk In Chicago

City of Chicago officials committed to a series of specific steps designed to address the practice of pedestrian stops and pat-downs (colloquially known as stop-and-frisk) after the latest critical report on the process from former U.S. Magistrate Judge Arlander Keys.

The report shows, as an example, that 70% of all pedestrian stops are conducted on African Americans in Chicago, despite the reality that African Americans comprise only 33% of the city's population. This high percentage of focus on African Americans has remained consistent over the past several years, making clear that the practice of pedestrian stops disproportionately impacts communities of color in Chicago.

The City of Chicago is responding with a promise to fix the process for recording stops and pat-downs by Chicago police officers.

Keys details an unsystematic process where officers are allowed to rewrite reports about pedestrian stops when the initial report failed to contain a constitutional reason for stopping and searching someone on Chicago's streets.

Officers have been permitted to change the reports up to seven times - with assistance or "coaching" from supervisors. The number of reports that have been changed multiple times has increased in recent years, going up by 10% in one recent quarter.

"If it takes an officer up to seven times to justify a stop, one has to ask how many of these stops were lawful to begin with," said Karen Sheley, director of the Police Practices Project for the ACLU of Illinois. "When you consider the number of stops that take place, it is clear that Chicago residents of color have been subject to unconstitutional searches at the hands of CPD officers."

After reviewing the report, the City outlined a number of specific steps to review and reform the process of collecting and reporting the data, including the way that supervisors interact with officers on these reports.

"The City has committed to make substantial and important changes to how it reports and analyzes pedestrian stops," Sheley said. "These stops are serious events in people's lives - people are pressed against a wall or automobile with a police officer placing their hands inside their pockets or their clothing. There must be a constitutional reason for every stop and search before an officer undertakes it. Critically, the City has also agreed to address the racial disparities in these stops, rather than fight about whether the disparities exist."

Keys' report is the latest analysis emanating from a 2015 agreement between the City of Chicago and the ACLU. The agreement followed an ACLU report showing that stop-and-frisk was used more than four times as often in Chicago as compared to New York City. The ACLU report also demonstrated that people of color were far more likely to be stopped and searched than white Chicago residents.

Keys' report discusses at length meetings that he, as Consultant, had with Chicago residents. Keys tells the harrowing story of one young man who was stopped and searched by police with a gun pointed in his face. Other community members told of being searched in a fashion that made clear the police were looking for marijuana and other drugs, not firearms and other weapons that would justify the search. Additionally, community members report receiving no apology or explanation when nothing was found.

Keys, an African-American male who has lived and worked in the area for decades, notes that while many residents in predominantly African-American communities are aware of the constitutional standards for a pedestrian stop and search, "It means nothing in their world."

Keys also noted a "sea change" in the cooperation between the parties. This cooperation led directly to the City's agreement to improve this process. CPD will review its process for collecting data about pedestrian stops and pat downs and address the inadequacy of the data currently being collected. The Consultant observed that the process for collecting data is so flawed that it makes true analysis of the situation nearly impossible.

-

See also:

* Tribune: Report Finds Chicago Cops Revising Reports On Street Stops, Sometimes Multiple Times.

In his report, Keys lauded Mayor Lori Lightfoot's administration for what he called "the sea change" he has seen in the city's level of cooperation since she took office in May.

"The City's new administration has shown remarkable speed and progress in fast-tracking the police reform efforts connected with this Agreement," he wrote.

* Crain's: 'Stop And Frisk' Still Disproportionately Impacting Black Chicagoans: Study.

* Chicago Reporter: Stop-And-Frisk Down 80% In Chicago But Black And Latinx People Still Hit The Hardest, Judge Finds.

-

Plus:

* CityLab, 2018: Where Chicagoans Are Being Stopped And Frisked.

"In just a four-month period in 2014, Chicagoans were stopped and frisked at four times the rate at which New Yorkers were in 2011, when the practice was at its peak in New York City."

-

And:

* CNN, January 2019: Former NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg Defends Use Of 'Stop And Frisk' Policing.

"[A] full-throated defense."

* AP, November 2019: Bloomberg Apologizes For 'Stop-And-Frisk' Police Practice.

-

Comments welcome.



Permalink

Posted on November 20, 2019


MUSIC - 🚨 Michael McDonald Alert.
TV - Comic-Con 2020: Fans vs. Critics.
POLITICS - When Bigotry Masquerades As Choice.
SPORTS - Beachwood Sports Radio: The Bears' Bad Day.

BOOKS - Searching For The World's Largest Owl.

PEOPLE PLACES & THINGS - The Tao Is To Chill.


Search The Beachwood Reporter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Email:

Follow BeachwoodReport on Twitter



Beachwood Radio!