Chicago - Dec. 11, 2017
Music TV Politics Sports Books People Places & Things
 
Beachwood Politics
Our monthly archive.
Who We Are
Chicago by the numbers.
Sausage Links
Wiki Daley
Wiki Rahm
Illinois Channel
CAN TV
Ralph Martire
Doonesbury
Government Attic
Division Street
Indie Political Report
The Obameter
ProPublica
The Intercept
SCOTUS Blog
American Dream Betrayed

Boeing Refuses To Disclose Any State Department-Clinton Foundation E-Mails

Boeing Chairman and CEO W. James McNerney, Jr. was asked Monday to make any e-mails between Chicago-based Boeing and the U.S. State Department during the time State helped Boeing secure a Russian contract and Boeing made a contribution to the Clinton Foundation available for inspection.

The request came from a representative of the National Center for Public Policy Research, Boeing shareholder and National Center Executive Director David Almasi.

Between the shareholder meeting Monday and last year's meeting, Boeing went to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to fight a shareholder proposal submitted by the National Center for Public Policy Research on Almasi's behalf asking the company for more transparency in reporting its methodology for making charitable donations. Boeing was successful in getting the SEC to agree, in January 2015, that it would not require Boeing to place the proposal before shareholders for a vote.

On Monday, the National Center asked McNerney to release any e-mail correspondence Boeing officials had with the U.S. State Department, as the government's copies of at least some of these e-mails may have been stored on Secretary Clinton's private server, and then deleted.

At Monday's shareholder meeting, National Center Executive Director David W. Almasi asked:

Although you have succeeded in blocking this shareholder's request for a report on charitable giving policies, you still have the opportunity to set the record straight that every communication between Boeing and the State Department was above board. Will you release every e-mail and communication that Boeing officials had relating to donations to the Clinton Foundation, and with the State Department?

McNerney claimed the company is "very mindful of interacting in the proper way with any charitable organization - including the Clinton Foundation," and "we feel comfortable with the donations we made." Yet he rebuffed Almasi's request to voluntarily make the e-mails available, stating the company would do so only "if there is some regulatory or legal proceeding that we're asked to become part of."

Said Almasi: "Boeing is digging itself deeper into a hole with its stubbornness. Boeing officials may have done nothing wrong, but doubling down on the ambiguity as to why they felt it best to donate to the family-run foundation of a serving public official who had helped them out begs prosecutors to investigate the possibility of honest services fraud. And refusing to release e-mails about it that they must have archived somewhere only heightens suspicion."

Almasi's full question, as prepared for delivery, is available here.

After being rebuffed at the 2014 shareholder meeting, when McNerney called Almasi's request "beyond the pale," Almasi and the National Center submitted a resolution demanding more transparency in the Boeing charitable-giving processes. It was meant to be included in the company's 2015 proxy statement and voted on at Monday's shareholder meeting, but Boeing fought the resolution and the Obama Administration's Securities and Exchange Commission allowed Boeing to keep it from being considered over a technicality regarding stock ownership. The resolution, in part, read:

Shareholders request that the Board of Directors consider issuing a semiannual report on the Company website, omitting proprietary information and at reasonable cost, disclosing: the Company's standards for choosing which organizations receive the Company's assets in the form of charitable contributions, the business rationale, if any, for such contributions, the intended purpose of each of the charitable contributions and, if appropriate, the benefits to others of the Company's charitable works.

The full text of the resolution is available here.

Almasi explained: "Such a report would have identified the company's standards for making charitable donations and shown whether such transactions were indeed ethical and legal. I was very disappointed when Boeing spent shareholder resources to have its lawyers petition the SEC to block its shareholders from voting on this non-binding recommendation to management. It gives the appearance that Boeing has something to hide."

During the shareholder meeting, Almasi reminded McNerney that there were many charities doing work in Haiti similar to what the Clinton Foundation was doing. McNerney, who earlier said the Boeing board would re-examine all shareholder resolutions after the meeting - regardless of whether they got past the no-action - also pledged to "keep engaging" with the National Center about the organization's shareholder resolution that they fought.

"While McNerney pledged to continue the discussion with us on the issue of increasing transparency, he maintained that he felt the company did the right thing and has no intention to make any communications between Boeing and the Clintons and the State Department available for general review," Almasi said. "This air of mystery is exactly how a prosecution for honest services fraud might begin. As a shareholder, it concerns me that this growing scandal involving the Clintons could someday hurt my investment in Boeing."

On April 22, Free Enterprise Project Director Justin Danhof likewise asked General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt to release e-mails between GE and the State Department because the company donated to the Clinton Foundation and Secretary of State Clinton helped GE secure a contract for a power plant in Algeria. Immelt, sounding much like Boeing's McNerney, replied: "That's not something we would do."

-

See also:

"When the Export-Import Bank sought to respond to critics with tighter rules for aircraft sales, it reached out to a company with a vested interest in the outcome: Boeing Co. , the biggest beneficiary of the bank's assistance," the Wall Street Journal reported last month.

"For months in 2012, according to about 50 pages of emails reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, the bank worked with Boeing to write rules that would satisfy critics in Congress and the domestic commercial airline industry - while leaving most sales of Boeing's airplanes to foreign carriers unscathed."

Here are those e-mails.

-

Comments welcome.



Permalink

Posted on April 29, 2015


MUSIC - The Weekend In Chicago Rock.
TV - Cricket vs. Brexit.
POLITICS - An Odd Call From Bermuda.
SPORTS - All Is Not Forgiven, Bears.

BOOKS - Turning Points Of The Civil War.

PEOPLE PLACES & THINGS - Baxter's IV Bag Shortages.


Search The Beachwood Reporter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Email:

Follow BeachwoodReport on Twitter



Beachwood Radio!


Ask Me Anything!